The evidence layer for AI

AI can answer anything.
Tensorust shows what is actually true.

Ask about a company. Get the answer and the records that prove it. Tensorust searches contracts, SEC filings, grants, research, lobbying, FDA, and cybersecurity records to produce cited answers from the public record.

Public records  ·  Resolved entities  ·  Traceable sources  ·  Explicit limits
Spend 60 seconds checking a company, not two days searching six databases.
Every figure links to its source 6 live government datasets Public-domain data only Methodology & limits published Free to try

AI answers are cheap. Evidence is not.

Most AI tools generate answers from text they have seen. Tensorust checks your question against structured public records, resolves the organizations involved, preserves the source trail, and reports what the evidence supports, contradicts, or cannot establish.
Your question
Tensorust Evidence Graph
Contracts SEC filings Grants Research FDA Cyber
Cited answer  +  confidence  +  limitations  +  source links

Not another chatbot. The verification infrastructure behind one.

A real evidence receipt

The answer is $18.1M. The evidence is 122 filings.
ON THE RECORD U.S. Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act database
$18.1M
Amazon disclosed federal lobbying, 2023
122
original filings behind the answer
Every amount is itemized and every filing is linked. Coverage is limited to federal lobbying, and client-name matching may split or miss affiliated entities.

AI gives you the answer. Tensorust gives you the evidence.

New · Tensorust Under Oath
Put any corporate claim under oath.
Paste a company claim, headline, or contract. We search federal contracts, filings, lobbying and grants, then publish the evidence receipt.
Saves you the hours of pulling and reconciling a company’s contracts, filings, lobbying and cyber records by hand.
Open the investigator →
Evidence receipt
The answer is $18.1M. The evidence is 122 filings.
See the original federal lobbying disclosures behind the Amazon result, with every amount itemized and linked.
The difference between an AI answer and an answer you can inspect.
Open the receipt →

How Tensorust saves you time and money

No vague ROI promise. Here is exactly where the hours and the dollars go, and how every tool on this site reinforces it.
TIME SAVED

The first-pass research is already done

Instead of opening dozens of tabs across USAspending, SEC EDGAR, the lobbying database and more, exporting records, reconciling company names, and formatting citations, you start with a cited answer built around your question.

How it reinforces this: every result links to the primary source, so your team verifies in minutes instead of assembling for days.
TIME SAVED

Experts review, they do not collect

Your analysts, strategy leads and BD team spend their expensive hours challenging the evidence, not gathering public source material that anyone could pull.

How it reinforces this: source facts are separated from limits, so there is nothing to re-derive before the real judgment starts.
MONEY SAVED

No $10k to $50k data seat

Incumbents charge five figures per seat per year for a single vertical. Tensorust is built on free public data, so you pay for a defined answer, not a license just to go look.

How it reinforces this: free public sources and no lock-in mean free live tools, or a cited brief from $149 instead of an annual subscription.

Tensorust does not replace subject-matter judgment, systematic review, legal review, or clinical diligence. It removes the hours and the license cost of assembling the public-record starting point, and shows its work at every step.

What that looks like in one number

Real examples from our collected public records. The data was already public - the time saving comes from joining the right records and knowing what the fields mean.
First-pass vulnerability review
94,0001,647
reported vulnerabilities → the ones CISA lists as actively exploited
A 98.2% smaller first-review queue.
Severity tells you what could hurt; exploitation tells you what attackers already use. One field removes hours of triage. Try it →
Contract claim check
$266M$22M
announced headline → dollars actually paid out, on the record
One lookup instead of an afternoon in USAspending.
The announced ceiling and the money actually obligated are different fields. We pull both and link the award. Try it →
Answer vs evidence
$18.1M122 filings
one AI-sized answer → the original federal records behind it
Every amount itemized. Every filing linked.
The total is useful. The source trail is what makes it trustworthy. Open the receipt →

Start with the decision you already have

Choose a question. Tensorust assembles a cited public-record starting point around it, in place of the hours your team would spend finding and formatting the sources by hand.
Medical affairs

Who is shaping this disease area?

Map visible researchers, institutions, and active subtopics before an external-science plan or a focused expert review.

R&D and strategy

What is changing in this technology?

Use a landscape to locate current research activity, leading organizations, visible themes, and source records to inspect next.

Business development

Where should we look before outreach?

Build a cited picture of the science and public activity around a molecule, platform, competitor set, or therapeutic area.

Portfolio and diligence

Does this topic justify deeper work?

Use a transparent public-source packet to decide whether a field, asset, or technical question is worth spending expert time on next.

Any corporate claim

Is a common claim actually supported?

Test a claim against the public record: contracts, filings, lobbying, grants, FDA and cyber. See what is supported, overstated, or missing context, with every figure linked.

Competitive monitoring

What should we keep watching?

Turn a topic into a repeatable source scope for ongoing landscapes, research-leader maps, or a monitored public-record pulse.

Decision pages

Useful public research signals for decisions your team is already making. Each page is a first-pass literature scan already done and cited, saving the hours of assembling it.

Each page is a source-linked starting point, not a claim of clinical, commercial, or investment truth. Inspect the cited record before acting.

Browse all decision pages ›

Try it live

Enter a topic and get a research-leader preview in seconds, instead of an afternoon of PubMed searches and reconciling author names by hand.

A live preview from recent PubMed: top research leaders, institutions, and subtopics. The full brief adds citation weighting, name disambiguation, cross-source signals, and a cited PDF.

Data we draw on

A growing, governed lake of public data - the breadth you would otherwise license from several separate vendors.

We continuously collect and normalize open, permitted data across many domains, keeping source, rights, and provenance on every record. A sample of the scale we work with:

150M+
scholarly works (OpenAlex, Crossref)
37M+
biomedical records (PubMed)
8M+
patents (USPTO)
Millions
federal awards, vulnerabilities, recalls

Sources include OpenAlex and Crossref (scholarly), PubMed (biomedical), USPTO (patents), USAspending and SEC EDGAR (federal & company), CISA and NVD (vulnerabilities), openFDA and others (safety and recalls), and public economic statistics. If a public-data trail exists, we can build on it.

See the work, not just the promise

Real source-linked packets built from public records. Each is the days of first-pass analyst work you do not have to do, already assembled and cited. Open any PDF and inspect the citations.
Pharma / KOL

GLP-1 / Obesity Research-Leader Map

A ready-to-review view of the public researchers, institutions, and recurring topics behind a major therapeutic area.

Recent recordsLeader shortlistLimits stated
Pharma / KOL

Alzheimer's Disease Research-Leader Map

A source-linked discovery layer for medical affairs, strategy, and BD teams scoping a large and fast-moving disease area.

Recent recordsInstitution viewPMID audit trail
Battery & Energy

Solid-State Battery Materials

A cited public-record landscape for quickly locating research momentum, visible institutions, technical themes, and papers worth opening first.

Research momentumInstitution scanCited papers
Advanced Materials

Graphene / 2D Materials

A cited snapshot of the research landscape for teams judging where the field is active and which work merits deeper review.

Topic trendsLeading institutionsSource linked
Portfolio Diligence

CRISPR-Enabled CAR-T Cell Therapy

A polished research-leadership and momentum packet for scoping an emerging platform area without treating publication volume as a commercial conclusion.

600 records4 pagesSource-limited
Cell Therapy

Allogeneic iPSC Cell Therapy

A cited, visually checked sample that shows the research and institution signals a team can use to frame deeper diligence.

270 records4 pagesPMID citations
Counterfactual Evidence

Wind-Blade Recycling Evidence Audit

Twenty common absolute claims tested against cited Crossref and U.S. DOE records, with a transparent decision and limits for each claim.

20 claimsDOE + CrossrefClaim-by-claim

Each packet is a starting point for a defined decision question, not a claim of exhaustive coverage or a substitute for domain review. We build briefs and maps for any indication, molecule, technology, competitor set, or region. Browse cited research-leader maps across 59 therapeutic areas in the research-leader library.

Pricing

Clear and project-based, priced against the analyst hours and the five-figure data seat it replaces. Start with a free sample.

Every engagement starts with a free cited sample so you can check the data before you commit. Prices below are starting points; final scope (depth, sources, competitor set, cadence) sets the quote.

Cost comparison

Pay for the brief, not the manual research time.

OptionPublished hourly benchmarkIllustrative 5-hour allocation
External life-sciences research support$100 to $400 per hour$500 to $2,000
Tensorust Instant BriefFlat price$149

The five-hour figure is a simple staffing illustration, not a consultant quote or a claim that every manual assignment takes five hours. NIH's life-sciences guide lists $100 to $200 per hour for foundational data collection and research support, and $200 to $400 for mid-level consultants. A separate medical-communications guide lists medical-strategy contractors at $130 to $160 per hour. Actual scope, seniority, and geography vary. NIH SEED rate guide ยท EPM Scientific medical-communications guide

Focused Brief

$299

One topic, indication, or competitor. A cited landscape or KOL snapshot, delivered in a few days.

Deep Engagement

from $5,000

Multi-source competitive or KOL intelligence, custom scope, for a major decision. Quoted to the work.

Ongoing monitoring is available from $600/month after a first engagement. Need something else? Ask for a custom quote.

Free cited mini-brief

Give us one decision and we will do the first-pass public-record work for it, free. It costs you an email and saves your team the hours of assembling the starting point.

Request a one-page public-data snapshot for the topic your team is evaluating. No automatic billing, no promise of a commercial conclusion, and every included source is inspectable.

By requesting, you are asking Tensorust to reply about this topic. If the form relay is unavailable, your email app will open with the request filled in.

Method & trust

Why you can act on it, and verify it in minutes instead of re-checking the work from scratch.
Matthew Busel, founder of Tensorust
Built by Matthew Busel
Founder and engineer. I built the data engine and every tool on this site, in public. A real person stands behind it, reachable by email, and every number here traces to a government source you can open yourself.
Connect on LinkedIn

Contact

Tell us the decision you are trying to make. We will send back a cited sample and scope what assembling it by hand would cost your team in hours.

Send the topic, indication, or competitor set you care about and we will send back a short cited sample so you can check the data before anything else.

Or write directly: mattbusel@gmail.com

Your data stays yours. Tensorust reads only public government and scholarly records. We store no private data, and nothing you type into a tool is sold, shared, or used to train anything.